View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 9:40 pm Post subject: "Nightmare" for January 3, 2006 |
|
|
Here is the Nightmare puzzle from January 3. I eventually solved it by identifying a few "unique rectangles" of different types.
Code: |
Puzzle: DSN010306
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . . 3 | 6 7 . |
| . . . | 6 . . | . . 9 |
| . . 8 | . 7 . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 5 . | . . 1 | . 8 . |
| . 7 6 | . 2 . | 5 3 . |
| . 2 . | 5 . . | . 9 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . 4 . | 2 . . |
| 1 . . | . . 5 | . . . |
| . 6 4 | 2 . . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
If you do not use unique rectangles, I think this would be a very difficult puzzle indeed.
Go for it!
Keith
(I'll post my solution later.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Bryant
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 559 Location: Denver, Colorado
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 11:39 pm Post subject: Here's one way to get it done ... |
|
|
Hi, Keith!
I've noticed that people over on the "Nightmare" site are calling this one Ruud's toughest puzzle yet. I did find a fairly simple way to crack it without relying on unique rectangles.
Using only the standard techniques I arrived at this position:
Code: | 2 149 59 149 159 3 6 7 8
3457 134 357 6 158 248 13 24 9
6 1349 8 149 7 249 13 24 5
349 5 39 349 6 1 7 8 2
489 7 6 489 2 489 5 3 1
38 2 1 5 38 7 4 9 6
3579 389 3579 1389 4 6 2 15 37
1 389 2 7 389 5 89 6 4
357 6 4 2 13 89 89 15 37 |
I worked on this long enough to realize that just fixing a single value somewhere wasn't enough to crack the puzzle wide open. So then I started looking for one more hidden pair.
My attention was drawn to a peculiar form of symmetry in the bottom left 3x3 box. Suppose that the value "9" is placed at either r7c2 or r8c2. Then the {3, 5, 7} triplet is revealed in the bottom left 3x3 box, the {1, 3, 4} triplet is created in the top left 3x3 box, the {5, 7} pair is uncovered in row 2, and r1c3 = 9.
Armed with this information we easily see that r7c2 <> 9 and also that r8c2 <> 9:
r7c2 = 9 ==> r1c3 = 9
r7c2 = 9 ==> r8c2 = 8 ==> r8c7 = 9 ==> r8c5 = 3 ==> r6c5 = 8
But now we have the {1, 5} pair in r1c5 and r2c5, leaving no possible way to complete r9c5, which must be a "1" because of r8c5 = 3.
The argument when r8c2 = 9 is almost exactly the same:
r8c2 = 9 ==> r1c3 = 9
r8c2 = 9 ==> r8c7 = 8 ==> r8c5 = 3 ==> r6c5 = 8
But now we have the {1, 5} pair in r1c5 and r2c5, leaving no possible way to complete r9c5, which must be a "1" because of r8c5 = 3.
So we can eliminate "9" from r7c2 & r8c2, leaving the {3, 8} pair in those two cells ... the rest of the puzzle is easily solved. dcb |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|