| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:52 am    Post subject: No XY/XYZ-Wings: Set A Puzzle 13 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Same Rules!
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   +-----------------------+
 
 | . . 4 | 2 . 7 | . 5 . |
 
 | . 2 . | . . 3 | . . . |
 
 | 3 . 7 | . 6 8 | . . . |
 
 |-------+-------+-------|
 
 | 8 . . | 3 . 1 | . . 6 |
 
 | . . 2 | . . . | . . . |
 
 | 1 3 6 | 7 . . | 5 . 8 |
 
 |-------+-------+-------|
 
 | . . . | . . 4 | 6 . . |
 
 | 7 . . | . . . | . . 2 |
 
 | . . . | 6 . 9 | . 3 5 |
 
 +-----------------------+
 
 | 	 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		storm_norm
 
 
  Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:00 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Code: | 	 		  .---------------------.---------------------.---------------------.
 
| 6      18     4     | 2      19     7     | 1389   5      139   |
 
| 9      2      158   | 4      15     3     | 178    6      17    |
 
| 3      15     7     | 59     6      8     | 1249   1249   149   |
 
:---------------------+---------------------+---------------------:
 
| 8      479    59    | 3      459    1     | 2479   2479   6     |
 
| 45     4579   2     | 59     8      6     | 13479  1479   13479 |
 
| 1      3      6     | 7      49     2     | 5      49     8     |
 
:---------------------+---------------------+---------------------:
 
| 25     159    3     | 18     27     4     | 6      1789   179   |
 
| 7      6      19    | 18     3      5     | 149    1489   2     |
 
| 24     148    18    | 6      27     9     | 17     3      5     |
 
'---------------------'---------------------'---------------------' | 	  
 
the grid above is after the initial x-wing on 5
 
then this use of a naked pair elimination
 
if r9c2 is not 4 => leaves naked pair on 18 in r19c2, this eliminates the 1 in r3c2
 
r3c2=> 5
 
r7c2 <> 5, r7c1 <> 2, r9c1 = 2
 
which means r9c1 is not 4
 
 
I will need help with this AIC notation
 
 
(4)r9c2=np(18)r19c2-(1=5)r3c2-(5)r7c2=(5-2)r7c1=(2)r9c1; r9c1 <> 4 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Asellus
 
 
  Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:09 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Norm,
 
 
Your AIC uses a 2-cell ALS along the chain.  In a bivalue (the smallest possible ALS), it is obvious that there is a strong link (or weak link, since it is conjugate) between the two digits.  In an ALS larger than 2 cells, any two (grouped as necessary) digits within the ALS are strongly linked.  Here, you are using the 2-cell 148 ALS in r19c2.  So, from that, you could, in principle, use (1)r19c2=(4)r9c2 or (1)r19c2=(8)r19c2 or (8)r19c2=(4)r9c2.
 
 
In your AIC, you are using the first choice (which is the only useful one since the grouped <8>s do not weakly link to anything).  This is how the complete AIC appears:
 
(4)r9c1 - ALS[(4)r9c2=(1)r19c2] - (1=5)r3c2 - (5)r7c2=(5-2)r7c1=(2-4)r9c1; r9c1<>4
 
 
[Edit to fix typo and clarify.]
  Last edited by Asellus on Thu Nov 06, 2008 1:43 pm; edited 1 time in total | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:56 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| Hint: Don't leave [stack 1]. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Asellus
 
 
  Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:08 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Norm,
 
 
An alternate view that is equivalent to your AIC is the 2 ALS "xz wing" of {1458} in r139c2 and {245} in r79c1.  The shared exclusive <4>s give shared common pincer <5>s in r3c2 and r1c7, eliminating <5> from r7c2.  As an AIC, it is:
 
(5)r7c2 - ALSr139c2[(5)r3c2=(4)r9c2] - ALS[(4)r9c1=(5)r7c1] - (5)r7c2; r7c2<>5
 
 
I don't know if that's what Danny is hinting at. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		ravel
 
 
  Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:42 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Asellus wrote: | 	 		  | I don't know if that's what Danny is hinting at. | 	  
 
I see a (half) M-wing there. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:32 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | ravel wrote: | 	 		   	  | Asellus wrote: | 	 		  | I don't know if that's what Danny is hinting at. | 	  
 
I see a (half) M-wing there. | 	  
 
Bingo   | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		storm_norm
 
 
  Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:31 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				can anyone give me a graphical representation of what a ALS-xy, ALS-xz looks like?  the reason I ask is because nothing i have read on the subject has brought me closer to finding them.  for my money, these set counting techniques are better left for an algorithm in a basic program.     what I can guartentee in return is a fat smile and total gratification once this concept is finally integrated in my blind brain.  what I don't want to do is read 4 pages of examples.  I want candidates circled, I want arrows, I want lines of thought, I want descriptions of why the candidates have a relationship, etc, etc, etc        please??? | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:11 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				>  can anyone give me a graphical representation 
 
>  of what a ALS-xy, ALS-xz looks like?
 
 
And, please put your reply in the "Solution Techniques" thread.
 
 
Thank you,
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 12:10 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | storm_norm wrote: | 	 		  can anyone give me a graphical representation of what a ALS-xy, ALS-xz looks like?  the reason I ask is because nothing i have read on the subject has brought me closer to finding them.  for my money, these set counting techniques are better left for an algorithm in a basic program.     what I can guartentee in return is a fat smile and total gratification once this concept is finally integrated in my blind brain.  what I don't want to do is read 4 pages of examples.  I want candidates circled, I want arrows, I want lines of thought, I want descriptions of why the candidates have a relationship, etc, etc, etc        please??? | 	  
 
Everything you ever wanted to know (and a whole lot more) about ALS.
 
 
http://www.sudoku.org.uk/SudokuThread.asp?fid=4&sid=10326&p1=1&p2=11 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Asellus
 
 
  Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:05 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I just want to say that I think that the ALS tutorial in the link from the previous post is excellent!  I agree with the author that terms such as "xz-wing" are less useful than grasping the power of ALS in general.  (And, nowhere is subset counting used, which, I agree, is more for computers than for people.) | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |